Creationist explanation carbon dating Kannda sex chat without registration
In particular, it describes a time when God catastrophically destroyed the earth and essentially all its life.
The only consistent way to interpret the geological record in light of this event is to understand that fossil-bearing rocks are the result of a massive global Flood that occurred only a few thousand years ago and lasted but a year.
Although the number of samples is small, we observe little difference in C level as a function of position in the geological record.
This is consistent with the young-earth view that the entire macrofossil record up to the upper Cenozoic is the product of the Genesis Flood and therefore such fossils should share a common = 0.0024 = 0.24 pmc).
Equally as persuasive as the Another RATE project documents the existence of abundant Polonium radiohalos in granitic rocks that crystallized during the Flood and further demonstrates that the uniformitarian assumption of constant decay rates is incorrect.
The bottom line of this research is that the case is now extremely compelling that the fossil record was produced just a few thousand years ago by the global Flood cataclysm.
These samples were analyzed by one of the foremost AMS laboratories in the world.
ACTS & FACTS IMPACT RADIOMETRIC DATING FOSSILS REFLECT LIFE'S ORIGINAL DIVERSITY DIAMONDS AND STRATA HAVE TOO MUCH CARBON-14 GEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE INDICATES RAPID FORMATION MUCH EVIDENCE EXISTS FOR A WORLDWIDE FLOOD Evolutionists generally feel secure even in the face of compelling creationist arguments today because of their utter confidence in the geological time scale.
These values fall squarely within the range already established in the peer-reviewed radiocarbon literature.
When we average our results over each geological interval, we obtain remarkably similar values of 0.26 percent modern carbon (pmc) for Eocene, 0.21 pmc for Cretaceous, and 0.27 pmc for Pennsylvanian.
In particular, they discovered the very slow nuclear decay rates of elements like Uranium while observing considerable amounts of the daughter products from such decay.
They interpreted these discoveries as vindicating both uniformitarianism and evolution, which led to the domination of these beliefs in academic circles around the world throughout the twentieth century.Uniformitarianism assumes that the vast amount of geological change recorded in the rocks is the product of slow and uniform processes operating over an immense span of time, as opposed to a global cataclysm of the type described in the Bible and other ancient texts.